You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the codebase uses the replace() method to modify parts of datetime objects, which can inadvertently create invalid dates under certain conditions. Could we implement a more robust approach for these date manipulations to ensure accuracy and reliability?
Utilizing replace() on datetime objects to alter the year can lead to invalid dates.
Examples of issues include setting February 29th in a non-leap year, or setting the day to the 31st in a month with only 30 days.
Illustrative Example:
Consider a date of February 29, 2024 (a leap year). Using replace() to set the year to 2023 (a non-leap year) results in an invalid date:
fromdatetimeimportdatetime# Potentially problematic use of replaceleap_date=datetime(2024, 2, 29)
invalid_date=leap_date.replace(year=2023) # Raises ValueError
In contrast, dateutil.relativedelta handles this correctly:
fromdatetimeimportdatetimefromdateutil.relativedeltaimportrelativedelta# Using relativedelta to safely subtract yearsleap_date=datetime(2024, 2, 29)
valid_date=leap_date-relativedelta(years=1) # Adjusts to February 28, 2023
Potential Solution:
Use dateutil.relativedelta, which safely adjusts dates by accounting for calendar rules, such as varying month lengths and leap years. This eliminates the need for manual error handling due to date validity.
Replace instances of replace() to modify datetime objects with dateutil.relativedelta to perform date arithmetic safely and avoid potential invalid date errors.
Hi there! 👋
I noticed that the codebase uses the
replace()
method to modify parts of datetime objects, which can inadvertently create invalid dates under certain conditions. Could we implement a more robust approach for these date manipulations to ensure accuracy and reliability?CodeQL Alerts
Here are the specific instances CodeQL flagged:
TensorFlow-stocks-prediction-Machine-learning-RealTime/useless/investing_API/Investing_api_util_and.py
Line 173 in fa30548
Explanation
Issue:
replace()
on datetime objects to alter the year can lead to invalid dates.Illustrative Example:
Consider a date of February 29, 2024 (a leap year). Using
replace()
to set the year to 2023 (a non-leap year) results in an invalid date:In contrast,
dateutil.relativedelta
handles this correctly:Potential Solution:
dateutil.relativedelta
, which safely adjusts dates by accounting for calendar rules, such as varying month lengths and leap years. This eliminates the need for manual error handling due to date validity.Example Solution:
Action Required:
replace()
to modify datetime objects withdateutil.relativedelta
to perform date arithmetic safely and avoid potential invalid date errors.References:
Thank you so much for your time and effort in maintaining this project! 🌟
Best,
Shrey
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: