-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
passing parameters #46
Comments
You should be able to pass options as keyword arguments to the constructor. The available ones are documented in the GLPK manual (available at http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk), section 2.10.5 "glp intopt — solve MIP problem with the branch-and-cut method", paragraph "Control parameters". For example, the time limit is |
Great thanks a lot! Does GLPK have an absolute optimality gap? The user manual states that mip_gap is the relative optimality gap. |
Sorry, I don't know more that what's in the manual... |
Are there plans to implement methods This would mean handling the two cases of |
No plans I'm aware of; MPB is deprecated. A MOI wrapper for GLPK is not far off (jump-dev/GLPK.jl#53). It will then be a bit more work to expose these as MOI optimizer attributes. |
OK. I just saw that Unfortunately, I will still need to run code based off MPB during the next couple months, because of callbacks and because I need it now 😏 |
That's understandable :). PRs accepted if you'd like to add |
How does one pass in time limit, absolute optimality gap, and relative optimality gap stopping condition parameters to GPLK when using const solver = GLPKSolverMIP() ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: