You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 22, 2021. It is now read-only.
When trying to solve a mincost flow on an infeasible network, we get a warning and a NaN matrix:
LightGraphsFlows.mincost_flow(g, cap, demand, cost)
glp_intopt: optimal basis to initial LP relaxation not provided
WARNING: Not solved to optimality, status: Infeasible
WARNING: Infeasibility ray (Farkas proof) not available
WARNING: Variable value not defined for component of x. Check that the model was properly solved.
3×3 Array{Float64,2}:
NaN NaN NaN
NaN NaN NaN
NaN NaN NaN
I find it explicit enough, but we could add a optimal boolean in the response tuple, so that users can check if it was feasible and then handle the flow.
Another option would be to return the JuMP status.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is the algorithm employed in the function mincostflow polynomial? If not, is there a possibility to replace the current function with a faster polynomial algorithm?
When trying to solve a mincost flow on an infeasible network, we get a warning and a NaN matrix:
I find it explicit enough, but we could add a optimal boolean in the response tuple, so that users can check if it was feasible and then handle the flow.
Another option would be to return the JuMP status.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: