We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I thought we already worked around this, using an atomic move-in-place:
GPUCompiler.jl/src/rtlib.jl
Lines 145 to 149 in c15433c
However, it looks like this still happens on CI, e.g. https://buildkite.com/julialang/metal-dot-jl/builds/947#018ee3aa-18e2-472c-b93f-f77451e3f87a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here's another instance: https://buildkite.com/julialang/cuda-dot-jl/builds/5180#018fb96f-180e-42ad-b06a-559061791f12
I'm actually not sure where this (fatal) error comes from, as LLVM.jl already seems to handle it gracefully:
julia> LLVM.Context() do ctx parse(LLVM.Module, read("wip.jl")) end ERROR: LLVM error: Invalid bitcode signature Stacktrace: [1] handle_diagnostic(diag_ref::Ptr{LLVM.API.LLVMOpaqueDiagnosticInfo}, args::Ptr{Nothing}) @ LLVM ~/Julia/pkg/LLVM/src/core/context.jl:134 [2] LLVMParseBitcodeInContext2(ContextRef::Context, MemBuf::MemoryBuffer, OutModule::Base.RefValue{Ptr{…}}) @ LLVM.API ~/Julia/pkg/LLVM/lib/15/libLLVM.jl:185
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I thought we already worked around this, using an atomic move-in-place:
GPUCompiler.jl/src/rtlib.jl
Lines 145 to 149 in c15433c
However, it looks like this still happens on CI, e.g. https://buildkite.com/julialang/metal-dot-jl/builds/947#018ee3aa-18e2-472c-b93f-f77451e3f87a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: