You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice if this line could be hopped over if there are no disturbances implemented: myf_d0!(xnext0, d0) = f!(xnext0, nonlinmodel, x0, u0, d0, model.p)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Edit: I do not understand why you use both the built-in Runge kutta solver (inner_solver_f! in the stack trace above) and also a solver from OrdinaryDiffEq.jl, according to the stack trace. You should use one or the other, not both at the same time.
I don't have disturbances implemented in my model.
The linearization shouldn't need to run on the disturbances, but it does, and this causes an error with the following error/stacktrace:
It would be nice if this line could be hopped over if there are no disturbances implemented:
myf_d0!(xnext0, d0) = f!(xnext0, nonlinmodel, x0, u0, d0, model.p)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: