Project Checkpoint #3 Presentation Plan

[drewreed2005]

Order With Links

• Home page (Drew/Toby)
  • Light mode/dark mode (Ekam's feature)
  • Index page (extremely brief)
  • Blogs page (TOBY, discuss conversion of notebooks)
• User Creation (Led by Kevin)
  • "[email protected]", "John Dalton", "123Dalton!", subjects: Chemistry, Physics
  • Show user creation
  • Log in with new user
• Class Creation (Also led by Kevin)
  • Create unique class for "Chemistry Club"
  • Search by interest: chemistry
  • ADD STUDENTS: [email protected], [email protected]
• Assignment creation in new class (Led by AJ)
  • Make assignment with multiple valid submissions
  • Sign in to toby@gmail
• Assignment submission (Led by Raymond)
  • You know what to do
• Assignment grading (Led by Drew)
• Stats stuff (led by Toby (backend), Aaron & Isabelle (frontend)) Link

[nVarap]

Observers: The Rapping Directors

Comments on Each Person

Name	Thoughts
AJ	Talked about creating assignments, showed planning. Talked about his specific feature, very intricate text editor
Drew	Talked about lightmode/dark mode, clearly understood navbar. Talked about his method to populate things
Raymond	Talked in depth about files, submission, file types, and how it works. Clearly participated and understood
Kevin Du	A bit shakier, missed out on some key stuff. Overall good, explained his feature clearly
Isabelle	Talked about their feature about for calculating various statistic calls. Tried to get postman up and running, showed code.
Aaron	Didn't do a lot of talking originally, needed prompting to start explaining what he did. Explained clearly, obviously understood what he did.
Houxoan	Didn't talk until prompted. Worked on an API. Demo wasn't working.
Toby	Talked about his feature with issues, Pull from GitHub API

Comments on Project

Includes

• Light Mode/Dark Mode
• Github issue Api
• User Creation + Interests
• Submissions, file types, submission amounts, regrading and viewing.
• Statistics, viewing and analyzing statistic material depending on data input form user
• Used PRs and branches for good practices

General Comments

Grows

• Login endpoint wasn't working as intended
• People were prompted by others, not necessarily flowed into each other.
• Would be nice if code was zoomed in more
• Statistics was a bit hard to follow? Unclear if it worked
• Some stuff showed up only on localhost

Glows

• Clear explanations about the submission
• Frontend looked really nice
• Clear understanding of how to improve, or add features
• Good scrum board, maybe could show a bi more?