Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Introduce Jwt type #160

Closed
clintfred opened this issue Jun 1, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Introduce Jwt type #160

clintfred opened this issue Jun 1, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@giarc3
Milestone
2020-06-19

Comments

@clintfred
Copy link
Contributor

clintfred commented Jun 1, 2020 •
edited by ernieturner
Loading

As an ironoxide user
I want to know if the JWT I have conforms to the ironoxide web-service's spec
so that I can catch errors in the structure and validity of my JWT before sending it to the server.

AC:

  • Jwt type exists and is used instead of &str
  • Jwt construction validates that all required fields exist
  • construction validates a supported algorithm is being used
  • variants exist for both IronCore and Auth0 JWTs -- should be extensible for other JWT types that might be supported in the future
  • (probably) signature verification, if possible?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@giarc3 giarc3

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2020-06-19
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ernieturner @clintfred @giarc3