We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One of our customers is DDoSing their Icinga 2 via /v1/hosts (a lot of hosts btw.). That locks up cluster communication entirely.
The separate HTTP CpuBoundWork gets e.g. 1 slot or 1/2 of all so that it doesn't bother the cluster.
Put actual processing of HTTP requests in a queue.
ref/IP/48306
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe alternatives you've considered Put actual processing of HTTP requests in a queue.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Maybe Icinga DB even deserves its own I/O, isolated from everything else. So that it doesn't influence cluster communication throughput.
No branches or pull requests
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
One of our customers is DDoSing their Icinga 2 via /v1/hosts (a lot of hosts btw.).
That locks up cluster communication entirely.
Describe the solution you'd like
The separate HTTP CpuBoundWork gets e.g. 1 slot or 1/2 of all so that it doesn't bother the cluster.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Put actual processing of HTTP requests in a queue.
Additional context
ref/IP/48306
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: