Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

metab and time-period issues with metab.bookkeep #128

Open
lawinslow opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

metab and time-period issues with metab.bookkeep #128

lawinslow opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement question

Comments

@lawinslow
Copy link
Member

metab.bookkeep currently doesn't use both midnights, and that some might interpret that as a better representation. But to do that, we may want to change metab.bookkeep, the metab code, and update documentation to make it clear.

Extensive discussion on the issue on PR #121
@jzwart
Copy link
Member

jzwart commented Jun 10, 2020

There are concerns about NEP != GPP + R; should we revisit midnight to midnight input data and / or calculating GPP differently than it is calculated now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lawinslow @jzwart