Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ADMinistrative boundaries #941

Open
matamadio opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Update ADMinistrative boundaries #941

matamadio opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@matamadio
Copy link
Contributor

matamadio commented Jun 30, 2023

The global boundaries currently in use are based on GAUL 2015, which were the source selected for the official world bank boundaries. They have then been optimised in several ways for the purpose of use in TH.

As of 2023, they are outdated and need to be replaced for all administrative levels (ADM0 - ADM1 - ADM2)

@matamadio matamadio self-assigned this Jun 30, 2023
@levis-git
Copy link

Hi Matamadio,

I have done a comparision between different sources of ADM 2 data, including your upload of the GAUL2015 data.

My results are:

  • GADM has the most polygons (356.508), however it seems like it will not be updated anymore (as a new update was announched for fall 2023 but was never released)
  • GeoBoundries has the second most polygons (49.346) and also polygons in the area's where I am interested in. The source seems to be maintained
  • The ESRI Global Polio Adminstrative Boundries has 48.745 polygons but focuses mostly on Africa.
  • The GAUL2015 has 38.258 polygons but seems to be not updated anymore.
  • The OSM has no worldwide coverage of ADM 2 regions

Therefore my advice is:

  • Use Geoboundries as main source of ADM 2 data
  • Supplement countries that are not well covered in the ADM 2 data (e.g. Australia, Brazil, and many more) of GeoBoundries with other ADM 2, ADM 3 and ADM 4 sources from Geoboundries, Who's On First and OSM-Boundries.

Hope this is helpful. Let me know if you have any questions.

@matamadio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Levi for the contribution.
Indeed GeoBoundaries seems to be the most solid and updated at the moment; however, for inclusion in WB tools, boundaries must first be approved by the WB GeoSpatial team. While GAUL 2015 were previously approved, other sources are not.
This is particularly important when releasing public maps under WB logo, specifically for those area that are disputed / conflict area (India/Pakistan/China boundaries, and others).

So, unfortuately we are stuck with GAUL 2015 until a new standard is approved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants