Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Must be able to display disputed borders #788

Open
stufraser1 opened this issue Aug 10, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

Must be able to display disputed borders #788

stufraser1 opened this issue Aug 10, 2017 · 7 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@stufraser1
Copy link
Member

stufraser1 commented Aug 10, 2017

We need to be able to show disputed borders on the map,
Jammu and Kashmir area is key example:
See dashed lines in the below World Bank map. We have a field, DISP_AREA, in the attributes of the files g2015_2014_0_upd270117 / g2015_2014_1_upd270117 / g2015_2014_2_upd270117
At each level, where DISP_AREA=YES, the border should be displayed as dashed. DISP_AREA=NO should remain solid

image

@stufraser1 stufraser1 added this to the 2.1 milestone Aug 10, 2017
@fjacon
Copy link
Collaborator

fjacon commented Aug 14, 2017

@tonio will look into this next week.
Note that so far disputed aera are on the maps : they do not belong to any country. and in fact there is a problem because it says "Administrative unit not available " in the title. See below for an area inside Jammu and Kashmir.
th

@stufraser1
Copy link
Member Author

stufraser1 commented Aug 15, 2017

I will provide links by email to an updated ADM boundary layer, that attribute the northern Jammu&Kashmir ADM0 area to Pakistan -- I changed the ADM0 name -- and the southern area to India (there are two areas called Jammu&Kashmir in the version used currently). The new files are date labelled 020217.

Edit: I realised this won't work, as it effectively shows J&K as part of the countries without a disputed border, which is not correct either.

@stufraser1
Copy link
Member Author

If we adjust only the ADM0 code in the underlying boundary files, to match India (southern J&K) and Pakistan (northern J&K) would that enable J&K to be assigned hazard levels and also show India+J&K together on the map, or does the process also rely on the ADM unit name?

@fjacon
Copy link
Collaborator

fjacon commented Aug 15, 2017

I cannot answer this. We will have to wait for Antoine and François to return next week.

@fjacon
Copy link
Collaborator

fjacon commented Aug 21, 2017

There might be no matching regions between administrative divisions and Hazard set.
For example this hazard set : EQ-PAK-KIT-475 is declared with regions = pakistan
But I guess northern Jammu&Kashmir is not in this region. Then the processing will not take this into account.
This is a guess... to be confirmed

@stufraser1
Copy link
Member Author

stufraser1 commented Dec 15, 2017

Contingent on resolving #818

@matamadio
Copy link
Contributor

matamadio commented Sep 24, 2019

A python script is available in Thinkhazard/Basemap_processing for editing original WB boundaries into SHP for thinkhazard.
Edits include:

  • modification of geometric features to solve zoom issues (France, New Zealand, Japan)
  • modification of names;
  • adding ADM0 names translation fields;
  • adding disputed areas (to be shown in TH with different legend, e.g. dashed border)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants