Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Do functional methods even get populated in the Typedocs? I canny see any in the documentation. Types like should not be hidden (in typedocs):
Functions like should be documented rather than just put in TypeDocs IMO:
I think as and when users ask for functionality that we have within the SDK, but isn't currently documented, we should make a better effort in rectifying this. That way the documentation can grow organically. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
Closing this discussion for now as I've created this issue based on the feedback. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Since #835 was addressed, there are a number of functions within the account package which are relevant to consumers that are currently marked as
hidden
such as getTransactionsSummaries for instance.Now that we have a more structured approach to documentation we can discuss how we want to articulate these exported functions. These include:
There may be some others missing, but I would like to hear others thoughts @FuelLabs/sdk-ts
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions