First of all, thank you everyone who made pull requests for Uptime Kuma, I never thought GitHub Community can be that nice! And also because of this, I also never thought other people actually read my code and edit my code. It is not structured and commented so well, lol. Sorry about that.
The project was created with vite.js (vue3). Then I created a subdirectory called "server" for server part. Both frontend and backend share the same package.json.
The frontend code build into "dist" directory. The server (express.js) exposes the "dist" directory as root of the endpoint. This is how production is working.
- Node.js (You should know what are promise, async/await and arrow function etc.)
- Socket.io
- SCSS
- Vue.js
- Bootstrap
- SQLite
- data (App data)
- dist (Frontend build)
- extra (Extra useful scripts)
- public (Frontend resources for dev only)
- server (Server source code)
- src (Frontend source code)
- test (unit test)
Generally, if the pull request is working fine, and it does not affect any existing logic, workflow and performance, I will merge into the master branch once it is tested.
If you are not sure whether I will accept your pull request, feel free to create an empty pull request draft first.
- Fork the project
- Clone your fork repo to local
- Create a new branch
- Create an empty commit
git commit -m "[empty commit] pull request for <YOUR TASK NAME>" --allow-empty
- Push to your fork repo
- Create a pull request: https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/compare
- Write a proper description
- Click "Change to draft"
Here are some example situations in the past.
Easy to review, no breaking change and not touching the existing code
- Add a new notification
- Add a chart
- Fix a bug
- Translations
- Add a independent new feature
I do not have such knowledge to test it.
- Add k8s supports
Some pull requests are required to modify the core. To be honest, I do not want anyone to try to do that, because it would spend a lot of your time. I will review your pull request harshly. Also, you may need to write a lot of unit tests to ensure that there is no breaking change.
- Touch large parts of code of any very important features
- Touch monitoring logic
- Drop a table or drop a column for any reason
- Touch the entry point of Docker or Node.js
- Modify auth
It changed my current workflow and require further studies.
- Change my release approach
- Any breaking changes
- Duplicated pull request
- Buggy
- Existing logic is completely modified or deleted
- A function that is completely out of scope
I personally do not like something need to learn so much and need to config so much before you can finally start the app.
- Easy to install for non-Docker users, no native build dependency is needed (at least for x86_64), no extra config, no extra effort to get it run
- Single container for Docker users, no very complex docker-compose file. Just map the volume and expose the port, then good to go
- Settings should be configurable in the frontend. Env var is not encouraged.
- Easy to use
- 4 spaces indentation
- Follow
.editorconfig
- Follow ESLint
- Javascript/Typescript: camelCaseType
- SQLite: underscore_type
- CSS/SCSS: dash-type
- Node.js >= 14
- Git
- IDE that supports ESLint and EditorConfig (I am using IntelliJ IDEA)
- A SQLite tool (SQLite Expert Personal is suggested)
npm ci
(2021-09-23 Update)
npm run start-server-dev
It binds to 0.0.0.0:3001
by default.
It is mainly a socket.io app + express.js.
express.js is just used for serving the frontend built files (index.html, .js and .css etc.)
- model/ (Object model, auto mapping to the database table name)
- modules/ (Modified 3rd-party modules)
- notification-providers/ (individual notification logic)
- routers/ (Express Routers)
- socket-handler (Socket.io Handlers)
- server.js (Server main logic)
-
Set the env var
NODE_ENV
to "development". -
Start the frontend dev server by the following command.
npm run dev
It binds to
0.0.0.0:3000
by default.
You can use Vue.js devtools Chrome extension for debugging.
npm run build
Uptime Kuma Frontend is a single page application (SPA). Most paths are handled by Vue Router.
The router is in src/router.js
As you can see, most data in frontend is stored in root level, even though you changed the current router to any other pages.
The data and socket logic are in src/mixins/socket.js
.
- Create
patch-{name}.sql
in./db/
- Add your patch filename in the
patchList
list in./server/database.js
It is an end-to-end testing. It is using Jest and Puppeteer.
npm run build
npm test
By default, the Chromium window will be shown up during the test. Specifying HEADLESS_TEST=1
for terminal environments.
Install ncu
https://github.com/raineorshine/npm-check-updates
ncu -u -t patch
npm install
Since previously updating Vite 2.5.10 to 2.6.0 broke the application completely, from now on, it should update patch release version only.
Patch release = the third digit (Semantic Versioning)
Please read: https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/tree/master/src/languages
Since there is no way to make a pull request to wiki's repo, I have set up another repo to do that.
https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma-wiki
Check the latest issues and pull requests: https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc
- Draft a release note
- Make sure the repo is cleared
npm run update-version 1.X.X
npm run build
npm run build-docker
git push
- Publish the release note as 1.X.X
npm run upload-artifacts
- SSH to demo site server and update to 1.X.X
Checking:
- Check all tags is fine on https://hub.docker.com/r/louislam/uptime-kuma/tags
- Try the Docker image with tag 1.X.X (Clean install / amd64 / arm64 / armv7)
- Try clean installation with Node.js
git clone https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma-wiki.git
cd uptime-kuma-wiki
git remote add production https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma.wiki.git
git pull
git push production master