Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing entry for 'force_retreat' namelist option in namelist_definition_cism.xml #107

Open
mpetrini-norce opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mpetrini-norce
Copy link

mpetrini-norce commented Sep 10, 2024

'force_retreat' is a CISM namelist option introduced (to my knowledge) in NorESM by @hgoelzer to prevent the ice sheet to expand outside the present-day observed ice mask (or, more in general, outside a mask given by the ice_fraction_retreat_mask input variable). For some reason I don't remember, this variable was included in the namelist_definition_cism.xml via SourceMods. To minimise the use of SourceMods, I suggest that this variable should be added to cime/config/namelist_definition_cism.xml (at least in NorESM2.5-alpha05 and future versions). Two important things I would like to highlight:

  1. The original 'force_retreat' option was a 'logical', whereas with multiple ice sheets it has become an integer (0 = do not force retreat, 1 = force retreat for all types of ice, 2 = force retreat for floating or weakly grounded ice). So introducing this variable would mean having something like this in here

<entry id="force_retreat">

    <type>integer</type>

    <category>cism_config_ho_options</category>

    <group>ho_options</group>

    <values>

      <value icesheet="gris">0</value>

      <value icesheet="ais" >0</value>

    </values>

    <desc> Flag that indicates whether or not mask SMB outside present-day grid.
      0=no force retreat, 1=force retreat where indicated by retreat_mask,
      2=force retreat for floating ice where indicated by retreat mask
      Default: 0 for Greenland, 0 for Antarctica
    </desc>

</entry>
  1. If force_retreat takes the value of 1 or 2, CISM input file should contain a variable called ice_fraction_retreat_mask which is telling where ice should be removed. Currently both the standard input files for Greenland and Antarctica don't include this variable - which is fine, although perhaps we might want to have it included by default in the future? Another important thing to note: previously, ice was removed wherever the ice_fraction_retreat_mask was equal to 0 - it is the opposite now, with ice being removed for any value of ice_fraction_retreat_mask > 0.

@hgoelzer @mvertens

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant