Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

questions related to applying quantityKind #5

Open
mobb opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

questions related to applying quantityKind #5

mobb opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@mobb
Copy link
Contributor

mobb commented Nov 8, 2023

Our application of quantityKind is not internally consistent yet. Some of us attach many (based on dimension vector), some of attach only one, high level. We need a better understanding of
a. relationships between existing quantityKinds(parent-child?, common dimension vector)
b. potential use of quantityKind for sorting/grouping a list of units (e.g., in a web application for choosing units)

@steveraysteveray
Copy link

Have you looked at this section of the QUDT wiki?

Basically, all quantity kinds related by skos:broader must have the same dimension vector.
The example given by the link demonstrates how different quantity kinds in the skos:broader hierarchy might have more or fewer applicable units.

All of the applicableUnit relations are (statically) computed from the hasQuantityKind relations from Units pointing to QuantityKinds, according to the algorithm shown at the link. This is refreshed with each Release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants