-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Challenge 25 - Regional Reanalysis for Europe with Machine Learning #10
Comments
hi @EsperanzaCuartero - I'd like to follow this project as well, on behalf of for my section (CAMS). Could you add my Github ID to the participants list? Many thanks. |
Thanks Esperanza, would you add @cornelsoci to this task too (he is also a mentor)? Thank you. |
Great, many thanks! |
Hi, I'm interested in this challenge but I currently have no professional experience in ML techniques. I could cross post on the mooc forum, I think many people there would be interested in applying for theses challenges. |
Hi @bzah |
Hi , I am interested in this chellenge because of many reasons, but I dont have any professional experience in Machine Learning Techinques. I have a wish to learn more about this, to try to make an other opportunities, Best regards, Duško Mrkonjić |
Hi, Thanks, |
Hi all, Thanks, |
Hi Duško, Great to hear that you are interested. We think it might be best for you to team up with some people with machine learning experience, to complement your own skills. Thanks, Mat |
Hi Hakam, Ideally we would target a methodology capable of providing the inherent uncertainty in the downscaling mapping. However, given the limited time of the project it may be best to first target a deterministic solution before extending to an approach capable of providing calibrated uncertainty estimates. Best, Mat |
Hi Irene, Thanks for your interest. We plan to assist with data retrievals and regridding to minimise the time spent on this aspect of the task. Best, Mat |
Hi everyone, If I am reading this right, you propose to use parts of the CERRA output as observation substitutes? What would be the problem with using actual observations? I was under the impression that, e.g., synoptic station data is stored in a database hosted by ECMWF? Cheers, |
Hi Till, |
Hi Andras,
your suggested response looks fine by me.
Thanks,
Cornel
…________________________________
From: HoranyiAndras ***@***.***>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 8:06:00 PM
To: ECMWFCode4Earth/challenges_2023 ***@***.***>
Cc: Cornel Soci ***@***.***>; Assign ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [ECMWFCode4Earth/challenges_2023] Challenge 25 - Regional Reanalysis for Europe with Machine Learning (Issue #10)
Hi everyone, a question concerning this: "A further stretch goal of the project could be to use sparse, noisy & synthetic observations from CERRA as an additional predictor, thus mimicking the use of observations in producing CERRA from ERA5."
If I am reading this right, you propose to use parts of the CERRA output as observation substitutes? What would be the problem with using actual observations? I was under the impression that, e.g., synoptic station data is stored in a database hosted by ECMWF?
Cheers, Till
Hi Till,
Thanks for your interest. You perfectly understood what we meant. Ideally observations would be the best way, but (i) they have only limited access and (ii) that would make the problem more complicated. At this stage we would prefer to keep everything on a simpler level and see what ML can deliver for regional reanalysis.
I hope it helps, thanks, best regards
Andras
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FECMWFCode4Earth%2Fchallenges_2023%2Fissues%2F10%23issuecomment-1492393550&data=05%7C01%7Ccornel.soci%40ecmwf.int%7Cb9ce3dc954264d5ffc9508db321295f5%7C21b711c6aab74d369ffbac0357bc20ba%7C1%7C0%7C638158827628843539%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qBiSEDx34o%2B9SkFtB2LMP2xcCZwEfYb5nBCAlrZmpuc%3D&reserved=0>, or unsubscribe<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FA6CONACT4ALLGZYLTFOJCBTW64MIRANCNFSM6AAAAAAVHCFEEA&data=05%7C01%7Ccornel.soci%40ecmwf.int%7Cb9ce3dc954264d5ffc9508db321295f5%7C21b711c6aab74d369ffbac0357bc20ba%7C1%7C0%7C638158827628843539%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=R%2B3UocT2zxgr0WjnQIkcpqQZyWMpa1KHGyh%2FSDsXv5A%3D&reserved=0>.
You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi, I am interested in participating in this challenge, But I am an Indian national. So am I eligible to participate in this challenge? |
@i-rok94 |
Project repo initialized at https://github.com/ECMWFCode4Earth/tesserugged |
Challenge 25 - Regional Reanalysis for Europe with Machine Learning
Goal
The main objective of this challenge is to develop a downscaling technique using Machine Learning (ML) tools such as to be able to generate finer spatial reanalysis information from a coarser grid-mesh reanalysis data.
Mentors and skills
Challenge description
ECMWF/C3S’s flagship global reanalysis is ERA5, which is covering the period 1940 to the present and has 31km of resolution on a global coverage (also includes a lower resolution uncertainty information). While ERA5 is very much appreciated by the users (more than 100 000 registered users in the CDS), they are also very much interested in accessing higher resolution and enhanced details in various parts of the Globe. For this, CERRA (Copernicus Regional Reanalysis for Europe) provides detailed information at 5.5km spatial horizontal resolution (CERRA also includes ensemble uncertainty information on 11km horizontal resolution). CERRA covers the period from September 1984 to June 2021. We will provide assistance to pre-process the ERA5 and CERRA datasets from the CDS.
The CERRA reanalysis includes a data assimilation system and a limited-area numerical weather prediction model. They have been used to produce high-resolution data using lateral boundary conditions from ERA5. The value of the regional reanalyses with respect to global reanalysis comes from the additional surface observations assimilated, the improved (i.e. more local details) description of the surface characteristics and the use of higher resolution tailor-made regional numerical weather prediction models.
The ultimate goal of this challenge in Code for Earth is to produce a model capable of downscaling ERA5 using regional forcings (orography or land-sea mask) towards the CERRA high-resolution analysis. A successful model would be capable of producing accurate CERRA estimates much faster than running the regional reanalysis system. As a proof of concept, we will target a limited number of parameters, starting with 2m temperature. The results would be compared to the original CERRA dataset and several baseline models. Possibly methodologies for downscaling could be conditional Generative Adversarial Models or Diffusion models.
A stretch goal of the challenge would be to provide ensemble-based uncertainty estimation to the downscaling fields. That might be achieved using the ensemble uncertainty information available from ERA5 and/or CERRA. A further stretch goal of the project could be to use sparse, noisy & synthetic observations from CERRA as an additional predictor, thus mimicking the use of observations in producing CERRA from ERA5.
From the practical point of view the challenge might consist of the following steps (take these points as guidelines):
Links and references
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: