Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wing cutout geometry with leading edge devices #1032

Closed
hardt-fa-flb opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

Wing cutout geometry with leading edge devices #1032

hardt-fa-flb opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@hardt-fa-flb
Copy link

Hello everyone,

I have a question regarding the leading edge devices: is it possible to generate a wing geometry from TIGL in which the cutouts for trailing AND leading edge devices are taken into account? The CCPACSWing::GetLoftWithCutouts method unfortunately only considers the trailing edge devices. Here is my use case:

tigl-slats.zip

Best regards,

Daniel

@hardt-fa-flb
Copy link
Author

Maybe connected to #990

@joergbrech
Copy link
Contributor

The leading edge devices are unfortunately not implemented yet.

@hardt-fa-flb
Copy link
Author

Is it planned to include the LE devices into the calculation in the near future?

@joergbrech
Copy link
Contributor

Unfortunately, this is not on our near future roadmap. Do you have a critical use case that requires this? If yes, I would suggest scheduling a video conference to discuss either quick workarounds or ways to push this development in TiGL.

@daha96
Copy link

daha96 commented Nov 11, 2024

I'm currently working on a project which needs the cut outs for LE and TE devices, but that project is not DLR related. We would need the functionality till the end of the year. I assume with this background I need to implement a workaround for this issue?

@joergbrech
Copy link
Contributor

[ ... ] We would need the functionality till the end of the year. I assume with this background I need to implement a workaround for this issue?

Yes, I am afraid so. I am happy to help in figuring something out. It all depends on how complex the cutouts have to be. In the simplest case, you could just have a Boolean Cut with a box, as in https://github.com/rainman110/tigl-workshop/blob/master/Exercises/solutions/Exercise2_Customization_Visualization_Solution.ipynb.

@hardt-fa-flb
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the workshop notebook! I think I'll use it for the workaround.

@DLR-SC DLR-SC locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 13, 2024
@joergbrech joergbrech converted this issue into discussion #1033 Nov 13, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants