-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some redirects return 302
when they should probably return 301
#1110
Comments
And We should be a bit careful - in something relating to DataLake earlier today, we were talking about renaming, say, |
Redirects that should be permanent, I think:
some which we may not be certain about:
|
Yes |
Looks like this will be trivial to implement once we're very confident of our list of permanent redirects. |
Going to make an executive decision and say we're currently happy with all of our redirects, and that we should communicate that they are permanent. This will just require someone going through all the |
Looks like this was solved in #1582...closing |
In my excavations of the CantusDB logs, I discovered that responses to some requests that I think are permanent redirect are actually returning
302
responses.In particular,
/node/<id>
and/office
return302
's rather than301
's. My understanding is that both of these redirects are permanent for the purpose of harmonizing Old and NewCantus URLs.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: