Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

batteries are more energy dense than plutonium #75336

Closed
dynst opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 7 comments · Fixed by #75361
Closed

batteries are more energy dense than plutonium #75336

dynst opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 7 comments · Fixed by #75361
Labels
<Suggestion / Discussion> Talk it out before implementing

Comments

@dynst
Copy link
Contributor

dynst commented Jul 31, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

A plut_cell is

"volume": "250 ml",
"weight": "80 g",
"ammo_type": "plutonium",

A minireactor can hold 10,000 plutonium cells, and each consumed cell produces just 100 kJ of power (since for many years now, a 'unit of battery' = 1 kJ).

"power": "100 W",
"//": "Here it is a multiplier on power efficiency - 1 unit of plutonium is 100 units of battery",

100 kJ in 80 g gives an energy density of 1250 kJ/kg. Which seems kinda low for sci-fi plutonium super-science.

A light_battery_cell holds the same amount of energy, 100 kJ, but weighs less than a plutonium cell at only 30 g. It has an energy density of over 3300 kJ/kg.

"weight": "30 g",
"volume": "25 ml",

A zinc-carbon light_dry_cell from #54287 stores 100 kJ in 20 g, making it even more energy-dense at 5000 kJ/kg.

Solution you would like.

In real life, rechargeable lithium ion batteries usually have an energy density closer to 460 kJ/kg, so the batteries should probably either weigh more or hold less energy.

According to https://www.epectec.com/batteries/chemistry/ zinc-carbon batteries are 0.13 MJ/kg (130 kJ/kg).

Describe alternatives you have considered.

No response

Additional context

Densities for vehicle batteries were already overhauled in #57193.

Battery density was increased back in #37146.

@dynst dynst added the <Suggestion / Discussion> Talk it out before implementing label Jul 31, 2024
@masema
Copy link
Contributor

masema commented Jul 31, 2024

Second problem. Plutonium has an energy density of .57 kJ/kg, so a single Plutonium cell should so each cell should produce, at most 45 kJ

@dynst
Copy link
Contributor Author

dynst commented Aug 1, 2024

Plutonium has an energy density of .57 kJ/kg

Where'd you get that? In a fission reactor, plutonium-239 generates electricity at a rate of 31,000,000,000 kJ/kg (31,000,000 MJ/kg). And for game purposes, the plutonium cells are just energy-dense handwavium and not intended to be realistic IIUC, in which case a minireactor should probably generate more, not less energy from each cell.

@kevingranade
Copy link
Member

The whole plutonium thing is a red herring, the issue is that batteries for handheld devices have way too high energy density.

@x-qq
Copy link

x-qq commented Aug 1, 2024

In real life, rechargeable lithium ion batteries usually have an energy density closer to 460 kJ/kg, so the batteries should probably either weigh more or hold less energy.

According to https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328396021_Energy_Density_of_Cylindrical_Li-Ion_Cells_A_Comparison_of_Commercial_18650_to_the_21700_Cells lithium-ion cells have around 230 Wh/kg density, and according to https://www.cei.washington.edu/research/energy-storage/lithium-ion-battery/ up to 330 Wh/kg.

1 Wh/kg is 3.6 kJ/kg, so according to these sources real life densities are 828-1188 kJ/kg.

But that aside, does this issue have any negative effect on the gameplay?

@dynst
Copy link
Contributor Author

dynst commented Aug 1, 2024

according to https://www.cei.washington.edu/research/energy-storage/lithium-ion-battery/ up to 330 Wh/kg.

I said 'usually,' and 'closer to.' There's no contradiction here. Those high end, cutting-edge, experimental numbers, that haven't necessarily even been commercialized yet, and that are very carefully prefixed with the qualifier 'as high as,' are very, very far from the commonplace, hold-em-in-your-hands, rechargeable lithium ion batteries that we're actually talking about in this case.

And it was only a few months ago in May 2024 that that record-breaking '323 Wh/kg' number got reported in a press release. (For some reason, that University of Washington web page is quietly rounding up 323 to "as high as" 330 Wh/kg.)

The P73 cell achieved 294 Wh/kg, the P79 cell 323 Wh/kg. This makes the P79 cell the new record holder and underlines the innovative strength of Farasis Energy.

@kevingranade
Copy link
Member

Multiple sources are telling me real commercially available and lootable lithium batteries are available in the up to 800 kj/kg range and higher capacities are rare to nonexistent, and even when present are going to be too specialized to do anything with.
Standalone batteries are in even worse shape and I'm looking at a bit over half that (500 kJ/kg) for these batteries, I'm also looking at differentiating between some other battery chemustries which is mostly bad news for those batteries, except for premium disposable batteries that weigh in at about 1000 kJ / kg.

@x-qq
Copy link

x-qq commented Aug 2, 2024

May be of interest:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
<Suggestion / Discussion> Talk it out before implementing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants