-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for FlowNet2 models #29
Comments
thanks ! As for now, I don't have much time to spend on this personal project. If the feature is integrated in future version, I'll make up some time to use it for FlowNetC training I prefer not to have personal modules as in NVIDIA's repo, because as you said the main goal here is to maintain the clearest code possible, which onyl requires to get the latest pytorch release and not build anything |
Thanks. I did a +1 for your feature request :) |
Alternately, the correlation can be implemented with PyTorch code like the CorrelationLayer here: Not sure about its speed though. |
You can have a look a this implementation, I'm planning on using it for a FlowNetC version and then hopefully a full FlowNet2 architecture |
Hi, I was wondering about the speedup compared to a pure PyTorch implementation (i.e. without C++/CUDA kernels). Do you have any idea? This is just out of curiosity - but I think it will me a good comparison point in your benchmark table. |
Do you have any thoughts about integrating FlowNet2 into this repository?
FlowNet2 models (including the custom operations such as correlation) have become available for PyTorch 0.3, Python 3.x.
https://github.com/vt-vl-lab/pytorch_flownet2
https://github.com/hellock/flownet2-pytorch
I am asking this is because this repository is structured in a better way and is easier to use and modify.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: