Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Req: Save settings in sidecar for later batch editing with command-line options or utility #119

Open
xiota opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@xiota
Copy link

xiota commented Oct 19, 2020

Would be nice to be able to save settings into a sidecar file that can be used later for batch processing with command-line options or utility.

To what extent would settings from filmulator-gui be compatible with the old command-line filmulator? What would be involved in backporting changes to the core algorithm to allow compatibility? As opposed to stripping out the Qt portions to create a separate CLI, batch processing version?

@CarVac
Copy link
Owner

CarVac commented Oct 19, 2020

The old CLI filmulator only consists of the Filmulation steps between the second and third mini histograms, and it had fixed settings only (the current defaults).

Personally, I don't like sidecar files but I understand that people may want to share settings, so that is something I'll eventually get to.

@xiota
Copy link
Author

xiota commented Oct 19, 2020

Suppose someone else were to take the current code and attempt to strip out the GUI. How difficult would it be? How closely tied is the filmulator algorithm to the GUI?

@CarVac
Copy link
Owner

CarVac commented Oct 19, 2020

It would not be unduly difficult. It still has a few Qt dependencies for lensfun, but it doesn't require a GUI.

All the image processing code is in the filmulator-gui/core directory.

@feklee
Copy link

feklee commented Jan 27, 2021

Just a remark: IMHO even better would be storing settings in DNG files. Then renaming and moving files does not require thinking about any dependent files. ACR does this, and it is the major reason why it’s my preferred RAW editor so far. It’s the most light weight one I know. It does not dictate a particular workflow. It just stays out of the way.

@CarVac
Copy link
Owner

CarVac commented Jan 27, 2021

Filmulator is definitely not going to support writing to raw files in any manner. That's just asking for trouble, data integrity-wise. Plus raw files are identified by the hashes of their contents.

I'm eventually going to offer sidecars because it plays nicely with backups, but I'm also going to let you not have sidecars since personally I find them irritating.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants