You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing this nice library! I have been trying to understand how weights affect the resulting detected communities and I found something which I did not expect.
Using the example graph you provided in the readme file, I created two versions containing weights on the edges - the edge weights in one version are scaled by a constant relative to the other version:
v1:
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 0 1
2 3 0.5
3 5 1
5 4 1
4 3 1
v2:
0 1 4
1 2 4
2 0 4
2 3 2
3 5 4
5 4 4
4 3 4
I ran the Leiden algorithm using the following options java -cp networkanalysis-1.1.0.jar nl.cwts.networkanalysis.run.RunNetworkClustering -r 0.2 -w
For v1, the same communities are detected as for the example in the readme file:
0 0
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 1
5 1
For v2, all nodes are part of one community:
0 0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
I found this a bit surprising, as I didn't expect the scale of the weights to be so important and I expected to obtain the same results for these two networks.
I can see that in v1.1 of the library, two normalization methods have been introduced for the edge weights, but I couldn't find an explanation for why / when this might be needed and how the different normalization methods might impact the result.
Would it be possible to provide a brief explanation for this?
Thank you.
Best,
Paula Tataru
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thank you for developing this nice library! I have been trying to understand how weights affect the resulting detected communities and I found something which I did not expect.
Using the example graph you provided in the readme file, I created two versions containing weights on the edges - the edge weights in one version are scaled by a constant relative to the other version:
v1:
v2:
I ran the Leiden algorithm using the following options
java -cp networkanalysis-1.1.0.jar nl.cwts.networkanalysis.run.RunNetworkClustering -r 0.2 -w
For v1, the same communities are detected as for the example in the readme file:
For v2, all nodes are part of one community:
I found this a bit surprising, as I didn't expect the scale of the weights to be so important and I expected to obtain the same results for these two networks.
I can see that in v1.1 of the library, two normalization methods have been introduced for the edge weights, but I couldn't find an explanation for why / when this might be needed and how the different normalization methods might impact the result.
Would it be possible to provide a brief explanation for this?
Thank you.
Best,
Paula Tataru
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: