Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Replace this line with
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hi again Wang Chao. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello, Angus,
It is well understood that the horizontal coedge can never be removed perfectly, and the test below can be fixed by a double union.
I am trying to understand the logic of processing the horizontal coedges and try to improve the runtime mentioned in the previous discussion. I am just curious that why the upper coedge in this pattern is cleaned but the bottom one remains there? Interestingly, if we remove one of the left vertical bars, the coedge can be removed.
this may be linked to this issue
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions