From e3303aaa498431f0dbb73272bf252eb845c3e5aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Diego Nieto Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:28:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update idempotent_inserts_mv.md no transactions in clickhouse --- .../materialized-views/idempotent_inserts_mv.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/en/altinity-kb-schema-design/materialized-views/idempotent_inserts_mv.md b/content/en/altinity-kb-schema-design/materialized-views/idempotent_inserts_mv.md index 7ea8b7fc9f..298f8bca51 100644 --- a/content/en/altinity-kb-schema-design/materialized-views/idempotent_inserts_mv.md +++ b/content/en/altinity-kb-schema-design/materialized-views/idempotent_inserts_mv.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ description: >- ## Why inserts into materialized views are not idempotent? -ClickHouse® still does not have transactions. They will be implemented around 2022Q2. +ClickHouse® still does not have transactions. They were to be implemented around 2022Q2 but still not in the roadmap. Because of ClickHouse materialized view is a trigger. And an insert into a table and an insert into a subordinate materialized view it's two different inserts so they are not atomic altogether.