Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revisit shared dev LIMS for Pika #475

Open
2 tasks
danielsf opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks

revisit shared dev LIMS for Pika #475

danielsf opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@danielsf
Copy link
Contributor

Since Pika is still required to touch ruby strategies and run datafixes on the LIMS database tables, we should revisit the conversation around #404 so that Pika is able to test changes to LIMS strategies and datafixes.

Tasks

  • Have meeting with Nick Mei and Jake Samson (before Jake leaves) about what is involved in standing up a new, shared, dev LIMS instance (for reference: Sergey built a dev LIMS instance 2 years ago and was able to resume using it in 2022 after just running the rake command to update the database)

Optional

  • Possibly reach out to the LIMS team to see if there is another way for this team to validate/test changes to LIMS. As Adam points out: no one on Pika is a ruby developer; we will be operating in a dangerous space every time we touch the ruby strategies.

The outcome of this meeting needs to be a choice between

  • Having one shared dev LIMS instance for all of Pika
  • Each member of Pika being able to and responsible for standing up their own dev LIMS as needed
  • The decision to start negotiations with the LIMS team about who really owns changes to the ruby strategies
@aimichaelwang
Copy link

aimichaelwang commented Jun 29, 2022

Low priority for now. Can set up on WorkStation following Nick Mei's tutorial. Most likely 1 day work for each member.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants