You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Once we have consensus cell types finalized for single-cell samples in ScPCA, we should perform some initial comparisons between them and estimates from quanTIseq and EPIC. The goal here is not (yet!) to perform a full in-depth comparison, but to help us assess whether it's reasonable to move forward with the current quanTIseq or EPIC results, which are rather different from one another. If one corresponds much more to single-cell cell types, that may help us to choose one over the other depending on consistency with single-cell cell types. If we see that both quanTIseq and EPIC are highly distinct from single-cell inferences entirely, it suggests we might focus more strongly on pursuing our own reference (#126).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Once we have consensus cell types finalized for single-cell samples in ScPCA, we should perform some initial comparisons between them and estimates from
quanTIseq
andEPIC
. The goal here is not (yet!) to perform a full in-depth comparison, but to help us assess whether it's reasonable to move forward with the currentquanTIseq
orEPIC
results, which are rather different from one another. If one corresponds much more to single-cell cell types, that may help us to choose one over the other depending on consistency with single-cell cell types. If we see that bothquanTIseq
andEPIC
are highly distinct from single-cell inferences entirely, it suggests we might focus more strongly on pursuing our own reference (#126).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: