-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[JOSS Review] Paper #29
Comments
The General comments were addressed in dc65f8f In densely populated areas, many houses could be within a 100 m x 100 m square. It is also a way to cumulate values for a city/region to identify heat demand hot spots. The quadtree refinement using a variable size of squares demonstrates that even better.
The target audience is included in the Statement of Need: |
The formatting issues were addressed in becfecb All line breaks were removed in the paper and the about section. The Table was fixed. |
The paper structure was addressed in 6e4b83d The State of the field was moved to the statement of need section. The outlook was split. The first part went into the summary and the second part was merged with the Resources. This is the only of the three sections that remains now. |
The bibliography issues were addressed in f9e661b There were indeed some brackets missing. |
The references issues were addressed in e9a4c5e I would refrain from adding a reference to the summary as I see it as an abstract and would not add a reference there either. |
@nmstreethran with that, I should have addressed your comments and remarks on this issue. Feel free to have a look and thanks again for your great comments! |
Yes, that's sufficient. I'm happy with all the other changes too. |
@AlexanderJuestel here are some initial comments on the paper. I have to do a quick check again so I'll comment if I have any further feedback.
openjournals/joss-reviews#6275
General comments
I'm curious how much lower the 100 m x 100 m resolution is compared to that of a building, since the paper states the following:
MWh was also defined here but it has already been used in the summary twice. I suggest moving the definition to the first instance where MWh is used. You can perhaps define it in the form of a footnote.
The acronym "HD" is used but is not defined anywhere in the paper.
According to my checklist, the statement of need must include the target audience of PyHeatDemand. The target audience should also be included in the documentation.
Formatting
I found some minor formatting issues in the PDF article and docs which I've listed below.
The blank lines in the following code are breaking the sentence, so they should be removed.
pyheatdemand/docs/source/about.rst
Lines 6 to 8 in 73f41fd
pyheatdemand/joss/paper.md
Lines 26 to 28 in 73f41fd
pyheatdemand/joss/paper.md
Lines 35 to 37 in 73f41fd
The table isn't rendered properly. I think you need to remove all of these dashes, except for the one below the header row, to fix it. Also, you have referenced the table as Tab. 1. Since the table doesn't have a caption, you can either add a caption, or remove the reference to Tab. 1 and just refer to it as the "table below".
pyheatdemand/joss/paper.md
Lines 93 to 101 in 73f41fd
Paper structure
I think the State of the field, PyHeatDemand Outlook, and PyHeatDemand Resources sections could possibly be merged with the previous sections as they are short. The outlook could go in the Summary. The state of the field should probably be in the statement of need. You can remove the GitHub repository and documentation link as the PDF of the paper already has a link to the repo. The DGE Rollout Webviewer and a reference to Herbst, 2021 could go in the summary as well, where you mention in the final sentence that the package was developed during the DGE Rollout project. You can also move Jüstel et al., 2023 here as an application of the package.
References
There are no citations provided in the summary and statement of need. I suggest adding citations to the following:
Bibliography
The DOI for Jüstel et al., 2023 is missing in the PDF. Change
note=
todoi=
to fix this:pyheatdemand/joss/paper.bib
Line 220 in 73f41fd
Herbst, 2021 seems like it's missing several authors?
Some of the titles are not capitalised properly in the PDF output of the paper. These words/titles (emphasised in bold) should be enclosed in braces in the bib file to preserve the capitalisation:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: