Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

skos:definitions to html defs for version 1 procedures #22

Open
meganrwong opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

skos:definitions to html defs for version 1 procedures #22

meganrwong opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@meganrwong
Copy link
Contributor

there are methods included in the current machine readable from version 1 of the text. URN:ISBN:978-0-909605-68-1

Included were the methods that were not included in version 2 of the text (ie chapter 1 and its procedures), and those that were split out into separate procedures in chapter 2.
For example 05A2 (version 1 text) is replaced in version 2 by
https://raw.githack.com/ANZSoilData/def-au-scma/master/html/05-soluble-Cl/05A2a.html
and
https://raw.githack.com/ANZSoilData/def-au-scma/master/html/05-soluble-Cl/05A2b.html

As far as I know there is no eVersion of version 1, will look into

@meganrwong meganrwong self-assigned this Mar 3, 2022
@meganrwong meganrwong added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 3, 2022
@meganrwong
Copy link
Contributor Author

We have pdf version of 1992. Need to extract defs to get to html fragments. Time required to do.
Need approach for extracting text from PDF

@meganrwong
Copy link
Contributor Author

required for the following methods -
5A2
6B2
7A2
7B1
7C1a
7C2
9C2
14E2
14F4
14F5
14G2

@meganrwong
Copy link
Contributor Author

meganrwong commented Apr 14, 2023

@dr-shorthair
@amacleod-cerdi had a crack at this. It is error prone and we'l have to create .jpgs for all the images and possible formulas. There may be better solutions out there for extracting to html and .jpg from text in pdf . But, I suspect in our case this lots of work that will return minimal value to users of this vocab. So I suggest we close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant