You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have been trying to figure out a Universal Proof Aggregator for Plonky2 circuits. Ideally we want the aggregator circuit to have a constant verification key irrespective of the circuits being aggregated. We have been using multiple recursion levels on individual circuits to reach threshold circuit with constant common data. While this approach solves the issue of rebuilding the aggregator circuit, this introduces a problem of cross verification. We think using a secret domain separator for circuits by the user solves the issue.
Heres the detailed description https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_Bi7VwTTYxmebJrah74Gr20hvTa3Hy90dWiOlgMZsgU/edit?usp=sharing
Looking forward to hear your thoughts on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey Team,
We have been trying to figure out a Universal Proof Aggregator for Plonky2 circuits. Ideally we want the aggregator circuit to have a constant verification key irrespective of the circuits being aggregated. We have been using multiple recursion levels on individual circuits to reach threshold circuit with constant common data. While this approach solves the issue of rebuilding the aggregator circuit, this introduces a problem of cross verification. We think using a secret domain separator for circuits by the user solves the issue.
Heres the detailed description
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_Bi7VwTTYxmebJrah74Gr20hvTa3Hy90dWiOlgMZsgU/edit?usp=sharing
Looking forward to hear your thoughts on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: